And if you can. Please elaborate on why you don't/do think it is.
Do you consider professor layton vs ace attorney canon
5
22
22 votes · Voting has ended
Likes (5)
Comments (22)
Likes (5)
Like 5
53
10
From :tennis: Sarasaland :soccer: Represent! :game_die:
Reverse Beach
1
2
Featured post
Comments (22)
And it's tied.
Reply to: DatSpaceBoi
Yeah its kinda funny honestly, I wasn't expecting it to b so split
I'm saying yes because there isn't really any definitive proof it's NOT canon. Till I see that, I'll go ahead thinking it is.
成歩堂君の声に「異議あり!」だから。担当した人も薬物乱用で逮捕されたし。
Reply to: 綾里春美
Okay so note in advance I'm using Google translate so It may have mistranslated but did you say the creator did substance abuse?
Reply to: :watermelon: :lemon: Phelps Galloway :tomato: 🧂
That's right. A voice actor has committed substance abuse.
Reply to: 綾里春美
Huh, I didn't know that. Thanks for the interesting info!
To be honest, I don't know very well about it, but I will put an yes, since there is a lot of votes for no.
I don't think it's canon for either franchise because of the layton time-line and the ace attorney time-line. Layton plays in the past and ace attorney, by the time of the release, was playing in the near future. So that wouldn't make sense
Reply to: :watermelon: :lemon: Phelps Galloway :tomato: 🧂
Where is this from?
Reply to: Tom
An official game guide for diabolical box
You can argue the canonicity of it of course. But there's no arguing the fact that this is the first and only time the layton series has ever been given a date
Reply to: :watermelon: :lemon: Phelps Galloway :tomato: 🧂
Ohh